| | The Flex Position |  |
|
|
| 2 WRs, 2 RBs, and the Flex. What do you want the flex position to look like? | | WR/TE Flex | | 17% | [ 1 ] | | WR/RB Flex | | 50% | [ 3 ] | | WR/TE/RB Flex | | 33% | [ 2 ] |
| | Total Votes : 6 | | | |
|
| Author | Message |
|---|
Garner
Admin
Posts : 596
Reputation : 33
Join date : 2010-06-13
Age : 35
Location : Cypress, Tx
| | Subject: The Flex Position Thu Aug 12, 2010 10:30 pm | |
| My vote is for the WR/TE and I hope you guys agree with me.
What we are looking at for our fantasy rosters so far:
QB
WR
WR
TE
RB
RB
Flex(WR/TE, WR/RB, WR/RB/TE)
K
Defense
5-6 bench players (something else that we could discuss)
Going with the WR/TE at the flex would stay more true to what you will actually see on the field. Aside from Miami, you will never see three RBs on the field at once, but it two TEs on field at the same time is far more plausible.
Moreover, seeing as this is a PPR league a potentially second TE would seem to foster that more and result in more points (this also considering what the leagues RB depth looks like vs. the leagues TE depth).
Anyway, that is my two cents- vote and weigh in please! | |
|
| | |
KyleJones
Posts : 370
Reputation : 42
Join date : 2010-06-13
Age : 36
Location : Houston
| | Subject: Re: The Flex Position Fri Aug 13, 2010 11:31 am | |
| I'm a fan of the RB/WR b/c they're way more in abundance and way more fun to follow over a TE. At the worst, I'd be okay with RB/WR/TE. | |
|
| | |
gingerraider
Posts : 454
Reputation : 53
Join date : 2010-06-13
Age : 36
Location : Atlanta, GA
| | Subject: Re: The Flex Position Fri Aug 13, 2010 11:38 am | |
| - KyleJones wrote:
- I'm a fan of the RB/WR b/c they're way more in abundance and way more fun to follow over a TE. At the worst, I'd be okay with RB/WR/TE.
this. | |
|
| | |
jlock
Posts : 63
Reputation : 6
Join date : 2010-06-13
Age : 36
Location : H-Town/Lubbock
| | Subject: Re: The Flex Position Fri Aug 13, 2010 2:47 pm | |
| i think it should just be another WR...if you have three RB starting on ur team then most likely one of them is a back up or slits time with another...with WR you will most likely have 2 #1 recievers and 1 #2 reciever starting | |
|
| | |
IB29
Posts : 218
Reputation : 17
Join date : 2010-06-13
Age : 36
Location : Dallas
| | Subject: Re: The Flex Position Fri Aug 13, 2010 3:40 pm | |
| | |
|
| | |
Garner
Admin
Posts : 596
Reputation : 33
Join date : 2010-06-13
Age : 35
Location : Cypress, Tx
| | Subject: Re: The Flex Position Fri Aug 13, 2010 8:46 pm | |
| - KyleJones wrote:
- I'm a fan of the RB/WR b/c they're way more in abundance and way more fun to follow over a TE. At the worst, I'd be okay with RB/WR/TE.
In the spirit of compromise, I'm willing to move to the RB/WR/TE at the flex. - jlock wrote:
- i think it should just be another WR...if you have three RB starting on ur team then most likely one of them is a back up or slits time with another...with WR you will most likely have 2 #1 recievers and 1 #2 reciever starting
a 3rd WR will be splitting time as well. Hence the reason for a flex, gives people more options. | |
|
| | |
Garner
Admin
Posts : 596
Reputation : 33
Join date : 2010-06-13
Age : 35
Location : Cypress, Tx
| | Subject: Re: The Flex Position Mon Aug 23, 2010 10:35 pm | |
| So, RB/WR/TE it is then.
If you so object, please provide a valid arguement as to why this should not be the case at the flex.
Our rosters will look like:
QB
RB
RB
WR
WR
TE
RB/WR/TE
Def
K
Bench
Bench
Bench
Bench
Bench
15 round draft- the order should be up soon! | |
|
| | |
Sponsored content
| | Subject: Re: The Flex Position | |
| |
|
| | |
| | The Flex Position | |
|
